Cover vs. Original

Live and Let Die


You know, this is really hard for me since Paul McCartney's Original and Guns n' Roses cover sound very similar to each other, except the Guns n' Roses version as a bit more edge to it. I Guess I like them both, but if I had to choose one I would say I would like Paul McCartney's original just a teeny bit more than the cover version by Guns n'Roses.

- Bryan Tremblay, Santa Barbara, United States, 18.11.2005


Guns and Roses
1991

vs.

Paul McCartney and Wings
1973

CD-Cover: Guns and Roses - Use Your Illusion I 52 % 48 % CD-Cover: Paul McCartney and Wings - All the Best
Results of the voting: Cover versus Original
Click on the cover for listening Click on the cover for listening
Guns and Roses 2586 Votes Paul McCartney and Wings

Comments about Live and Let Die:

1 2 3
i got my ears checked and i still hear the gnr version kicking the crap out of the original...not surprised that the vote is so close given how good each is.
- thumphreys, chicago, United States, 25.03.2007
I like Guns & Roses and Their verson of this classic. However for those who prefer it over the original seriously need to get their ears checked. Nobody can sing that song as well as Paul McCartney.
- Derek Warner, Cape Breton Island, Canada, 15.02.2007
I vote for the guns cover, it's more powerfull but he original y awsome
- David Urlanga, Beranga, Spain, 27.07.2006
People actually like the Guns and Roses version better than Paul McCartney's Original!? Wow! I would've thought that more people would have chosen Paul McCartney's version.
- Bryan Tremblay, Santa Barbara, United States, 18.04.2006
1 2 3
««« Top