 |
|
Baker Street
Foo Fighters lead kicks ass compared to the lame 70's sax solo it is replacing!
- Randy Myles, Ottawa, Canada, 16.02.2006
Foo Fighters
1997 |
vs. |
Gerry Rafferty
1978 |
| Click on the cover for listening |
|
Click on the cover for listening |
Comments about Baker Street:
foo fighters rulez! fuck the rest!
- Bazz, new york, United States, 06.03.2008 |
Gerry's version is so much better. Although I do like the Foo Fighters their version just sounds bad and muffled. Perhaps if they used a different sound on the guitar... or better yet, a saxophone! =D
- Tim, Malvern, England, 24.02.2008 |
The Gerry Rafferty original is a genuine work of art, however, the Foo Fighters version gives it an undeniable modern twist that rock fans can't go without
- Benson, New York, United States, 03.01.2008 |
Gerry Rafferty is the best.
- George, Athens, Greece, 07.12.2007 |
Foo Fighters are my passion, so I have to say he they did the way better job here. The Sax sux!
- Meg, Reno, United States, 10.11.2007 |
Great cover, beautiful solo work.
- Daisjun, Sydney, Australia, 26.10.2007 |
The Foo Fighters did a fine job but nowhere near as good as the original. "Lame ass sax solo?" I can tell I'm the oldest person here. Which one will still be heard 30 years from now? Yep, Gerry Rafferty!
- Sully, Soul Patch, United States, 27.08.2007 |
Foos version is one of their best covers. Their version simply rocks.
- Alex, Athens, Greece, 18.03.2007 |
This song is great to begin with, but Foo makes this song rip w/o sax
- Chuck, New Orleans, United States, 28.02.2007 |
I loved Gerry Rafferty's song way back, when I first heard it on the radio as a kid. However, Foo Fighters lend an edgy sound that makes me love the song even more.
- Rachael, Milwaukee, United States, 20.02.2007 |
|
