 |
|
Baba O'Riley (Teenage Wasteland)
Original version is inspired, cover is interesting and worthwhile, just not up to par with the original.
- Ian Page-Echols, Seattle, United States, 02.04.2006
The Waco Brothers
2000 |
vs. |
The Who
1971 |
| Click on the cover for listening |
|
Click on the cover for listening |
Comments about Baba O'Riley (Teenage Wasteland):
Apples and oranges people. They're both fantastic, go see the Waco Brothers live and you'll understand why people love them.
- Charles, New York, United States, 24.04.2008 |
Waco Brothers version is fun!
- Peggy, Milwaukee, United States, 06.04.2008 |
One bad cover doesn't mean Pearl Jam sucks. but no hes right the Who are untouchable especially in their rock operas. Who's Next was originally a rock opera entitled Lifehouse but the project was aborted with only a few key tracks intact one being "Baba O'riley
- Jim, Rome, United States, 18.01.2008 |
I like Waco bros version better.
- Marah, Zagreb, Croatia, 08.11.2007 |
How could anybody even consider covering Baba O'Reilly? Inspired stuff from The Who, and this, along with a lot of their songs, is untouchable
- Richie, Cork, Ireland, 14.08.2007 |
Neil Young's Rockin' in the Free World wasn't even good to begin with.
- Roni, Laguna Hills, United States, 23.07.2007 |
Neil Young's Rockin' in the Free World wasn't even good to begin with.
- Roni, Laguna Hills, United States, 23.07.2007 |
96.5 to 3.5 it is pathetic that anyone voted for them let alone 3.5% don't F*** with the who
P.S Pearl Jam sucks, write your own songs, they also butcherd a version of Neil youngs Keep on Rockin in the Free World.
- Who the fuck are the waco bros, Toronto, Canada, 12.06.2007 |
pearl jam version is way,way better.
- pedro, maia, Portugal, 31.12.2006 |
|
