Cover vs. Original

Come Together


No comparison really, but Wacko does a suprisingly good funk rendition.

- KC, London, England, 20.11.2007


Michael Jackson
1995

vs.

beatles
1969

CD-Cover: Michael Jackson - HIStory: Past, Present and Future, Book I 63.5 % 36.5 % CD-Cover: beatles - Abbey Road
Results of the voting: Cover versus Original
Click on the cover for listening Click on the cover for listening
Michael Jackson 4497 Votes beatles

Comments about Come Together:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7
hello, mj´s version is better... but the beatles version is good also..
l.o.v.e
- music, hollywood, United States, 26.11.2010
i like mike's version much much more but the version from beatles is also good
- nora, nyc, United States, 15.10.2010
The Beatles version uses real instruments and is performed by the original songwriters. It has warmth and a great groove. Jacksons version sounds like 80's pop with all those drum machines and synths. Plastic music. The Beatles rock!!
- Sally Benn, London, England, 13.10.2010
The Beatles version uses real instruments and is performed by the original songwriters. It has warmth and a great groove. Jacksons version sounds like 80's pop with all those drum machines and synths. Plastic music. The Beatles rock!!
- Sally Benn, London, England, 13.10.2010
UPS! I mean right *haha*

Mike is such an incredible human being and I love him and his music from the bottom of my heart <3
- jem, Vienna, Austria, 11.09.2010
I agree with Natalia!!! She's so wright!!!
- jem, Vienna, Austria, 11.09.2010
I have no words for this "Rod" and most of you Beatles fans. I dont know what the hell is your problem about MJ and why his success, talent, and importance to MUSIC IN GENERAL freak you out so much. No MJ fan is trying to put Beatles down here like you insist doing with MJ, you should grow up. Every music understanding human being can tell about MJ. He innovated and influenced music forever. He created pop music. And you Beatles fans fucking know it, or at least should before saying anything. I dont know why is that so freaking hard to admit for you guys. People will talk about MJ and his work for centuries. He sold almost 800 million copies. He's the king of entertainment. And I can write forever about MJ and I wont even mention Beatles. You damn crazy Beatles fans and you "Rod" should shut your fuck up. Your talking about Michael Jackson, for God's sake. And I'm not even mentioning what you "Rod" said about pedophilia cuz I'm not discussing it with some stupid who has no idea about what he's saying.

And finishing, MJ version for "Come Together" is fucking AWESOME and, in my opinion (each one has its own), WAY BETTER than Beatles version.
- Natalia, Brasilia, Brazil, 05.09.2010
The Beatles loved both sexes! MJ sucks and flirts around with li'l boys so he should've been David Seville instead of Elton John and get a baby-sitting job for the Chipmunks!
- Katherine, Fort Worth, United States, 04.09.2010
well personally i'm not trying to put down mj fans but to tell you the truth beatles are much more succesful than mj if you look at the facts. the beatles have many more world records than mj. they have more #1 top hit singles. the only reason people like micheal jackson is because he has so much karisma. But people like the beatles because they have better songs than micheal.
- FIllipino from St. James, Canada ontario Vaughn Maple, Canada, 07.06.2010
michael jackson is much better !!!
i love ma angel <3
- me, vienna, Austria, 16.05.2010
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
««« Top