 |
|
Land Of Confusion
With "Land Of Confusion" Disturbed have found the right song for a cover. More power, more rock - better than the original.
- Tamara, Duisburg, Deutschland, 12.01.2006
Disturbed
2005 |
vs. |
Genesis
1986 |
| Click on the cover for listening |
|
Click on the cover for listening |
Comments about Land Of Confusion:
I like both versions, but I love Disturbed and their version appeals more to me.
- PacJack, Bonneau, United States, 23.05.2010 |
I like Disturbed version, but appreciate Genesis for writing the original.
- Mikolaj, Rumia, Poland, 26.02.2010 |
I much prefer disturbed's. I have grown up on hard rock and the base oriented original isn't as appealing to me. Though both are good songs.
- Seth, The City of Time, Canada, 25.01.2010 |
i like both of these versions, disturbed and genesis are both great band and disturbed didn't completely fuck the song up like some bands do. so i say their both good. either way, you just can't beat the original
- Cliff, Columbus, United States, 01.01.2010 |
Disturbed.
Much better.
- Sean, St. Louis, United States, 30.10.2009 |
i like em both, however genesis is better. and disturbed doesn't make people wanna die.
- Anonmyous, N/A, United States, 09.10.2009 |
i like em both, however genesis is better. and disturbed doesn't make people wanna die.
- Anonmyous, N/A, United States, 09.10.2009 |
GENEIS!
- The Person, The City,The State, United States, 13.09.2009 |
I don't see the point of arguing about this. The point of making a cover is to pay homage to a great song, not to make a better version. It's a way to say, "Hey Phil, our generation feels the same way." So shut the fuck up, they are both amazing songs and I love them both the same.
- adam, pacific, United States, 20.08.2009 |
ok, as a grade 8 pianist i am slightly qualified to comment. genesis are better.
well said tim
- george, Bodmin, England, 30.07.2009 |
|
